yakov_a_jerkov (yakov_a_jerkov) wrote,
yakov_a_jerkov
yakov_a_jerkov

Spygate

Все, наверное, помнят возмущение Трампа, а за ним и трампистов тем, что Обама "шпионил" за кампанией Трампа 2016 года. Прослушивание разговоров Картера Пейджа они до сих пор вспоминают, хотя Пейдж, насколько я помню, во время прослушивания на кампанию Трампа не работал.

Недавно стало известно, что трамповский DOJ под предводительством сначала Сешинса, а потом Барра затребовал и получил доступ к e-mail'ам и т. п. журналистов WaPo, NYT и CNN, а сегодня мы узнали, что DOJ также получил личную data демократов в Конгрессе, в том числе Адама Шиффа.

Вот summary:
The Trump DOJ’s target list (so far):

—Wash. Post: 3 reporters. https://google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-justice-dept-seized-post-reporters-phone-records/2021/05/07/933cdfc6-af5b-11eb-b476-c3b287e52a01_story.html%3foutputType=amp

—CNN: Reporter Barbara Starr. https://google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/05/20/politics/trump-secretly-obtained-cnn-reporter-records/index.html

—NY Times: 4 reporters. https://google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/06/02/us/trump-administration-phone-records-times-reporters.amp.html

—Congress/Dems: Rep. Schiff, 11 others w/ House Intel Comm. https://google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/06/10/us/politics/justice-department-leaks-trump-administration.amp.html
Конечно, ни Трампа, ни трампистов эти новости ничуть не смутят, я это не для них пишу. Я пишу это для тех, кто, несмотря на все случившееся за последние пять лет, продолжает give them the benefit of the doubt, и воспринимает их возмущение "спайгейтом", как искренние переживания.

Aaron Rupar напоминает этот диалог тогда еще сенатора Харрис с тогда еще AG Барром: И, собственно, статья в NYT:

Hunting Leaks, Trump Officials Focused on Democrats in Congress
As the Justice Department investigated who was behind leaks of classified information early in the Trump administration, it took a highly unusual step: Prosecutors subpoenaed Apple for data from the accounts of at least two Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, aides and family members. One was a minor.

All told, the records of at least a dozen people tied to the committee were seized in 2017 and early 2018, including those of Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, then the panel’s top Democrat and now its chairman, according to committee officials and two other people briefed on the inquiry.

Prosecutors, under the beleaguered attorney general, Jeff Sessions, were hunting for the sources behind news media reports about contacts between Trump associates and Russia. Ultimately, the data and other evidence did not tie the committee to the leaks, and investigators debated whether they had hit a dead end and some even discussed closing the inquiry.

But William P. Barr revived languishing leak investigations after he became attorney general a year later. He moved a trusted prosecutor from New Jersey with little relevant experience to the main Justice Department to work on the Schiff-related case and about a half-dozen others, according to three people with knowledge of his work who did not want to be identified discussing federal investigations.

The zeal in the Trump administration’s efforts to hunt leakers led to the extraordinary step of subpoenaing communications metadata from members of Congress — a nearly unheard-of move outside of corruption investigations. While Justice Department leak investigations are routine, current and former congressional officials familiar with the inquiry said they could not recall an instance in which the records of lawmakers had been seized as part of one.

Moreover, just as it did in investigating news organizations, the Justice Department secured a gag order on Apple that expired this year, according to a person familiar with the inquiry, so lawmakers did not know they were being investigated until Apple informed them last month.

Prosecutors also eventually secured subpoenas for reporters’ records to try to identify their confidential sources, a move that department policy allows only after all other avenues of inquiry are exhausted.

The subpoenas remained secret until the Justice Department disclosed them in recent weeks to the news organizations — The Washington Post, The New York Times and CNN — revelations that set off criticism that the government was intruding on press freedoms.
Subscribe

  • Смотрю в книгу...

    Многовато у меня стало реакций на выступления Арбата, но не могу снова не отметить выдающийся уровень его идиотизма. Вот здесь он комментирует мою…

  • Чистое безумие

    В продолжение "О неудавшемся перевороте". Сегодня было опубликован проект письма, которое, по замыслу исполняющего обязанности руководителя DOJ's…

  • Джулиани

    Maggie Haberman (she knows what she is talking about) сообщает: Giuliani allies are looking at the Trump $ - even if it isn't $82 million - and are…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 25 comments

  • Смотрю в книгу...

    Многовато у меня стало реакций на выступления Арбата, но не могу снова не отметить выдающийся уровень его идиотизма. Вот здесь он комментирует мою…

  • Чистое безумие

    В продолжение "О неудавшемся перевороте". Сегодня было опубликован проект письма, которое, по замыслу исполняющего обязанности руководителя DOJ's…

  • Джулиани

    Maggie Haberman (she knows what she is talking about) сообщает: Giuliani allies are looking at the Trump $ - even if it isn't $82 million - and are…